(What is the law that provides the legal framework for e-governance in India? (b) 33. Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 (a) Indian Penal Code D) None of the above (C) IT-2000 In August 2014, the Supreme Court ordered the central government to respond to petitions from the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) alleging that the Information Technology Act gives the government the power to arbitrarily remove user-generated content.  On April 13, 2015, he announced that the Ministry of Home Affairs would form a committee composed of officials from the Intelligence Bureau, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the National Investigation Agency, the Delhi Police, and the Ministry itself to create a new legal framework. The move reportedly followed complaints from intelligence agencies that they were no longer able to combat online publications concerning national security or incite people to commit a crime, such as online recruitment for ISIS.   Former Minister of State at the Ministry of Information Technology, Milind Deora, supported a new « clear section to replace 66A ».  With effect from 15 March 2003, the Information Technology Act 2000 was amended to include which of the following instruments falls within its scope? Data protection regulations introduced in 2011 have been described as too stringent by some Indian and US companies. The rules require businesses to obtain written permission from customers before collecting and using their personal information. This applies to U.S. companies that subcontract to Indian companies.
However, some companies praised the strict rules, saying they would eliminate the fear of outsourcing to Indian companies.  The Act provides a legal framework for e-governance by recognizing electronic records and digital signatures. It also defines cybercrime and imposes sanctions on it. The law provided for the training of a certificate authority controller to regulate the issuance of digital signatures. It also established a cyber appeals tribunal to resolve disputes arising from this new law.  The Act also amended various sections of the Indian Penal Code of 1860, the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, the Banker`s Book Evidence Act of 1891 and the Reserve Bank of India Act of 1934 to adapt them to new technologies.  The objective of this Indian Penal Code is to create a general penal code for India. Although this law consolidates the body of law on this subject and is exhaustive in the areas for which it is declared by law, many other criminal laws have been created in addition to this law that regulate various crimes. I read the article above and got some knowledge from your article which is about the latest news from information technology This is actually excellent and useful data for us.
Thanks for sharing. Under which section of the Information Technology Act of 2000, updated in 2008, is theft of digital assets or information considered a cybercrime? The Indian government closely links data to citizens` privacy, and this becomes clear when Shiv Shankar Singh states: « Every person must be able to exercise a significant degree of control over this data and its use. Data protection is a legal safeguard to prevent the misuse of information about individuals on a medium, including computers.  Handling of computer records: Any person who knowingly or intentionally conceals, destroys or modifies computer source code used for a computer, computer program, computer system or computer network, if the source code of the computer is to be retained or maintained under applicable law, shall be liable to imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to two rupees lakh, or both. It is the law that provides the legal framework for e-governance in India On 24 March 2015, the Supreme Court of India ruled that Section 66A was unconstitutional in its entirety. The court said Section 66A of the Information Technology Act 2000 « arbitrarily, excessively and disproportionately interferes with the right to freedom of expression » under Article 19(1) of the Indian Constitution. However, the court rejected a request to remove sections 69A and 79 of the law, which deal with procedure and safeguards for blocking certain websites.   A significant change was made in 2008.
He introduced section 66A, which criminalized the sending of « offensive messages. » It also introduced Article 69, which gave authorities the power to « intercept, monitor or decrypt information on any computer resource. » In addition, provisions on pornography, child pornography, cyberterrorism and voyeurism have been introduced. The amendment was passed without debate in the Lok Sabha on 22 December 2008. The next day, he was passed through the Rajya Sabha. It was signed by President Pratibha Patil on 5 February 2009.     The Information Technology Act, 2000 (also known as ITA-2000 or Information Technology Act) is an Act of the Parliament of India (No. 21 of 2000) enacted on 17 October 2000. It is the primary law in India that deals with cybercrime and e-commerce. Section 69 allows for the interception and decryption of information. Refusing decryption is a criminal offense. The Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 allowed the government to tap telephones. But according to a 1996 Supreme Court ruling, the government can only tap phones in the event of a « public emergency. » However, no such restriction exists for Article 69.
 On 20. In December 2018, the Interior Ministry cited Article 69 in a decree authorizing ten central agencies to intercept, monitor and decrypt « any information generated, transmitted, received or stored on a computer. »  While some claim that this is a violation of the fundamental right to privacy, the Ministry of Interior has affirmed its validity on national security grounds.  . Do you have comparative public law and governance opinions? and MCQ PDF? If you have it, send me to my email address. In December 2012, Father Rajeev, a member of the Rajya Sabha of Kerala, attempted to pass a resolution to amend Article 66A. He was supported by D. Bandyopadhyay, Gyan Prakash Pilania, Basavaraj Patil Sedam, Narendra Kumar Kashyap, Rama Chandra Khuntia and Baishnab Charan Parida. Rajeev pointed out that cartoons and editorials allowed in traditional media are censored in new media. He also said that the law had barely been debated before its adoption in December 2008. . Excellent mail, good and valuable informationPickup baskets. The Information Technology (Guidelines for Intermediaries and Code of Ethics for Digital Media) Rules 2021 remove India`s Interim Guidelines Rules 2011.
 Also in November 2012, a Delhi law student, Shreya Singhal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) with the Supreme Court of India. It argued that Article 66A was vaguely worded because it violated Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution. The POL was adopted on November 29, 2012.   List of offences and corresponding penalties. I am happy after reading your content, it is such beautiful, fruitful and unique content. Nice blog post, so thank you for sharing this great blog post. Keep more messages to share. Have a nice day. Apply for a Canada Super Visa Since its creation as an amendment to the original law in 2008, Section 66A has sparked controversy over its unconstitutional nature: Interestingly, many bloggers have helped me clarify and give me a few things. Most ideas can be beautiful content. People to give them a good jolt, to understand your point of view and to pass on the command. Blockchain technology.
I appreciate your quality, it was really a very useful and informative blog! Eicher Transit mixer. Thank you for posting some of the best IT™ questions here. One of my cousins who wants to do a master`s degree in computer science at Cambridge University and is preparing for his entrance exam, I will definitely send him a link to your blog so he can benefit from it. Buy trial online. Three years in prison or 10 lakh rupees or both 1. Full unit coverage included the 10 units Response to Question 5. Includes an oriented answer to questions and the most expected Blog very useful and competent. I`m learning so much from here. Thank you for sharing this blog with us.
Mahindra Tipper What are the penalties under the Information Technology Act 2000? With the advent of the internet and the increasing penetration of the internet in India, the government began to shift its functions to the internet. India wants to regulate all digital activities through the Information Technology Act 2000. The Act contains detailed provisions on e-governance. (ii) Accompanied by fees not exceeding five thousand rupees, which may be prescribed by the Central Bureau and payable at least forty-five days before the expiry of the period of validity of the licence. Wow, thanks for sharing some very informative information. I am currently pursuing PGDM in Information Technology from the Distance Learning Institute and these MCQs are very useful to assess my learning for the same. Share more about it. Will the international SIM card work in the destination country I`m travelling to? Many different cards are accepted exclusively in certain countries. Make sure the GSM SIM card you buy works in the countries you visit if you want to do some research. 2FF SIM Card Which of the following laws will not be amended in the Information Technology Act 2000? Thank you for sharing such valuable information. I hope you will share more information like this. Please share more! If you need the registration of Pvt Ltd Bangalore and the new registration of the Bangalore company, click on the secondary or minor legislation of the Information Technology Act includes the Interim Guidelines Rules 2011 and the Information Technology Rules 2021 (Intermediate Guidelines and Digital Media Code of Ethics).